First Adreno 220 benchmarks show that it is a beast

Qualcomm’s Adreno GPU’s have always been seen as being a sub-par graphics compared to competing offerings from Imagination (PowerVR) and others like NVIDIA’s Tegra. This was essentially true with the Adreno 200 on Windows Mobile and Android mainly because of poor driver quality. Things are a bit different on Windows Phone 7 where the Adreno 200 is the only currently supported GPU, thanks to the tight integration with the OS and relatively good support provided by Microsoft. You can check out my recent Fable Coin Golf video to see that some pretty nice things can be done with it.

The Adreno 205 which is part of the MSM8X55 SoC package is a step forward in terms of performance and can be comparable in some case with the current top dog, the PowerVR SGX540 as seen in my benchmarks here. Qualcomm has also recently released new drivers for the 205 which slightly improves its performance compared to what you see in my benches (they are the ones used by Sony Ericsson in the Xperia Play).

But it is now time to take a look at the Adreno 220 GPU that many consumer are going to use in the coming months as it is part of the MSM8260 / MSM8660 SoC powering the upcoming HTC EVO 3D, HTC Pyramid and Palm’s TouchPad tablets (and probably countless other products that have yet to be announced). I’ve already posted a video of the dev devices in action during MWC11 but today Anandtech had the chance to the this device for a ride and perform some benchs on it.

So what’s the verdict? The Adreno 220 came out on top in every single test and followed by the SGX540 found in the LG Optimus 3D TI OMAP4630 and the Tegra 2. But take another look at the chart for a second. Do you see where the iPhone 4 is ? Now out of all the device in there; which one has the smoothest UI and UX and the best games ? You guessed it; the iPhone 4. This just goes to show that benchmark results aren’t always indicative of the over performance and experience that you will get with a product. What you can take out of this though, is that Qualcomm is really serious about it (also remember that the MSM8X60 is a dual core Cotex A8 not A9 like all other Dual-core SoC up there)

source: anandtech

  • Anonymous

    Actually, the Qualcomm SoC uses Scorpion cores, which falls somewhere between A8 and A9 in terms of performance and features, but is custom made by Qualcomm after years and millions of dollars in R & D. Please correct that.

  • http://www.mobiletechworld.com MobileTechWorld

    Hi Kapanak,

    I know that and have already talk about Scorpion at the beginning of my Windows Phone 7 review here: http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2011/01/12/windows-phone-7-review/

    I was simply pointing out that having Dual-Core A9s didn’t necessarily mean better performance.

    Cheers

  • Anonymous

    The Qualcomm is not a dual-core A8. It’s like calling an AMD dual-core Phenom chip a dual-core Pentium.

    While they have similar architectures, they are not the same.

  • Anonymous

    The Qualcomm is not a dual-core A8. It’s like calling an AMD dual-core Phenom chip a dual-core Pentium.

    While they have similar architectures, they are not the same.

  • Gary

    I have the same green video when I use Skype on my LG-P705f. Help!!!!!